Effects of a Tensioned Tendon Graft in a Bone Tunnel Across the Rabbit Physis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Children who sustain anterior cruciate disruption often are denied the standard reconstructive procedures because of the concern that drilling across the physis of the tibia and femur and compression from a tensioned graft will result in growth plate arrest. To test this concept and to assess whether a tendon placed in the tunnel would function in a manner similar to a fat graft after the resection of a physeal bar, tunnels were made across the proximal tibial physis and distal femoral physis in a group of immature rabbits. Four tunnel diameters were used from 1.95 to 3.97 mm, in three rabbits at each diameter, with patellar tendon autografts being used as the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in two of the animals. The knees were radiographed every 4 weeks, and the animals were euthanized 4 months after surgery. The surgically treated and control knees were salvaged, and each knee was examined grossly, radiographically, and histologically. Eight of the 11 animals had growth arrest of one or both physes. The larger the drill hole diameter the more marked was the deformity. The proximal tibial physis seemed to be the most vulnerable for growth arrest, occurring in eight of the knees. The insertion of a tendon did not seem to offer any protection to physeal arrest. Because of these findings, it is not recommended that tunnels involving 1% or more of the area of the physis be placed across the tibial and femoral physis to reconstruct the anterior cruciate in very skeletally immature children.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".