Preferential occurrence of 1-2 microindels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Microindels are unique, infrequent mutations that result in inserted and deleted sequences of different sizes (between one and 50 nucleotides) at the same nucleotide position. Little is known about the mutational mechanisms that are responsible for these mutations. From our database of 6,016 independent somatic mutational events in the lacI gene in Big Blue mice, we assembled the 30 microindels (0.5%) for analysis. Microindels with one nucleotide inserted and two nucleotides deleted (1-2 microindels) accounted for seven (23%) of the microindels observed, with the remaining microindels distributed among 21 other combinations of insertion and deletion sizes. A preferential occurrence of 1-2 microindels (20%) was also observed in human germline transmitted mutations in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD). An examination of the sequence flanking the mouse 1-2 microindels did not reveal obvious site specificity or associated secondary structure. A detailed examination of 1-2 microindels did not reveal the features typical of pure microinsertion and microdeletion events, but rather suggested a unique mutational mechanism. The 1 bp insertion in 1-2 microinsertions, and pure 1 bp insertions show distinct features. The mechanism for 1-2 microindels is not obviously a simple combination of pure microinsertion and microdeletion events. The dramatic enhancement of 1-2 microindels requires explanation. We speculate that certain error-prone polymerases may be responsible for the preferential occurrence of 1-2 microindels in both somatic tissues and germ cells. It is estimated that a human adult carries roughly 400 billion somatic 1-2 microindels with the potential to predispose to cancer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".