MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084425241 · doi:10.1107/s174430911103363x

Crystallographic analysis of the C-terminal domain of the<i>Escherichia coli</i>lipoprotein BamC

2011· article· en· W2084425241 on OpenAlexafffund
Kelly H. Kim, Suraaj Aulakh, Wendy Tan, Mark Paetzel

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section F Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMichael Smith Health Research BC
KeywordsCrystallographyChemistryBiophysicsAntiparallel (mathematics)Protein structureBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Gram-negative bacteria, the BAM complex catalyzes the essential process of assembling outer membrane proteins. The BAM complex in Escherichia coli consists of five proteins: one β-barrel membrane protein, BamA, and four lipoproteins, BamB, BamC, BamD and BamE. Here, the crystal structure of the C-terminal domain of E. coli BamC (BamC(C): Ala224-Ser343) refined to 1.5 Å resolution in space group H3 is reported. BamC(C) consists of a six-stranded antiparallel β-sheet, three α-helices and one 3(10)-helix. Sequence and surface analysis reveals that most of the conserved residues within BamC(C) are localized to form a continuous negatively charged groove that is involved in a major crystalline lattice contact in which a helix from a neighbouring BamC(C) binds against this surface. This interaction is topologically and architecturally similar to those seen in the substrate-binding grooves of other proteins with BamC-like folds. Taken together, these results suggest that an identified surface on the C-terminal domain of BamC may serve as an important protein-binding surface for interaction with other BAM-complex components or substrates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section F Structural Biology and Crystallization CommunicationsSame topicBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyFrench-language works237,207