Un modelo monárquico legislativo y jurídico para la Orden de Santiago : el maestre Lorenzo Suárez de Figueroa y los establecimientos de Uclés (1395) y Mérida (1403)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El maestre de Santiago, Lorenzo Suárez de Figueroa, inauguró un nuevo modelo de establecimientos donde aunaba dos tipos de disposiciones: el espiritual y temporal para los freires, y el de ordenanzas y leyes para sus vasallos. Su aprobación tuvo lugar en el hasta ahora poco conocido capítulo general de Uclés de 1395 y en el capítulo de Mérida de 1403 y están inspirados principalmente en la legislación de las Cortes de Juan I y Enrique III. Este estudio demuestra como el maestre, afecto a la causa del autoritarismo regio, asumió algunas de sus características para su propio proyecto de monarquismo maestral dentro de la Orden. Como apéndice documental se incluye la edición de los establecimientos de Mérida de 1403 y una reconstrucción de los de Uclés de 1395.Lorenzo Suárez de Figueroa, Master of the Order of Santiago, launched a new model of statutes combining two types of provisions: spiritual and temporal measures for the brethren, and laws and ordinances for his vassals. Their approval took place in the previously ill-known General Chapter of Uclés in 1395 and in the Mérida Chapter of 1403 and were essentially inspired by laws enacted in the Cortes of Juan I and Enrique III. This study shows how the Master, an advocate of the royal authoritarian cause, was able to include some of these characteristics in his own project of monarchical mastership in the Order. The edition of the Mérida Statutes of 1403 is included in the appendix along with a reconstruction of those approved in Uclés in 1395.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".