MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084475017 · doi:10.7589/0090-3558-43.4.623

VALIDATION AND NOVEL APPLICATIONS OF THE WHOLE-BLOOD CHEMILUMINESCENCE ASSAY OF INNATE IMMUNE FUNCTION IN WILD VERTEBRATES AND DOMESTIC CHICKENS

2007· article· en· W2084475017 on OpenAlexaff
Zsuzsanna Papp, Judit E. G. Smits

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Wildlife Diseases · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicAntimicrobial Peptides and Activities
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInnate immune systemBiologyChemiluminescenceWhole bloodHemolysisImmunologyLuminolImmune systemImmunityRespiratory burstAndrologyAnimal sciencePhysiologyInternal medicineBiochemistryMedicineChemistryChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The whole-blood chemiluminescence (WBCL) assay is a simple and rapid method of measuring production of reactive oxygen species by circulating leukocytes, particularly heterophils (birds) and neutrophils (other vertebrates). In the interest of substantiating a broadly applicable measure of innate immunity, we investigated the microplate WBCL method for several wildlife species as well as domestic broiler chickens. Lucigenin as a light enhancer was used for all avian blood, wild and domestic, while luminol was used in bear and frog blood. Use of ethylenedinitrilotetraacetic acid (EDTA) as the anticoagulant caused hemolysis of frog blood and decreased WBCL responses in all animals tested. Heparin, even in high concentrations, caused modest to no decrease of WBCL responses. The WBCL response correlated highly with heterophil or neutrophil numbers in all species tested. The WBCL response was tested in freshly collected blood as well as in blood one to five days postcollection in order to determine the utility of this assay for field studies when immediate access to laboratory facilities is not possible. One to three days of delay in performing the test after blood collection caused no, or only a slight, decay of the chemiluminescence response in most animals. Using domestic chickens, we tested the sensitivity of the WBCL method to detect differences between treatment groups and looked for loss of chemiluminescence response over several days using the original blood samples. Significant differences in the WBCL response between experimental groups of broiler chicken were detectable in freshly collected blood, as well as one- to four-day-old blood. Our results show that the innate immune response of populations of wild animals may be successfully compared using this assay, even when blood cannot be tested until a few days after collection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.672
Threshold uncertainty score0.236

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Wildlife DiseasesSame topicAntimicrobial Peptides and ActivitiesFrench-language works237,207