MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084479097 · doi:10.1121/1.4877621

The phenomenon of self-trapping of a strongly nonlinear wave

2014· article· en· W2084479097 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
О. В. Руденко, Claes M. Hedberg

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNonlinear Photonic Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsNonlinear systemAmplitudeShock waveLongitudinal waveInfinitesimalMechanical waveWave propagationClassical mechanicsQuantum electrodynamicsQuantum mechanicsMechanicsMathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Self means here an effect of a wave on itself. Several self-action phenomena are known in nonlinear wave physics. Among them are self-focusing of beams, self-compression of light pulses, self-channeling, self-reflection (or self-splitting) waves with shock fronts, self-induced transparency, and self-modulation. These phenomena are known for weakly nonlinear waves of different physical origin. Our presentation at ASA meeting in Montreal [POMA 19, 045080 (2013)] was devoted to strongly nonlinear waves having no transition to the linear limit at infinitesimally small amplitudes. Such waves can demonstrate particle-like properties. Self-trapping consists of the arrest of wave propagation and in the formation of a localized state. In particular, the model generalizing the Heisenberg' ordinary differential equation to spatially distributed systems predicts periodic oscillations but no traveling waves. Different models for strongly nonlinear waves will be considered and some unusual phenomena will be discussed. Preliminary results were published in Ac. Phys. 59, 584 (2013) and Physics-Uspekhi (Adv. Phys. Sci.) 183, 683 (2013). [This work was supported by the Megagrant No.11.G34.31.066 (Russia) and the KK Foundation (Sweden).]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicNonlinear Photonic SystemsFrench-language works237,207