Incidence and Host Determinants of Probable Occupational Asthma in Apprentices Exposed to Laboratory Animals
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Laboratory animal (LA) workers are frequently affected with allergic sensitization and occupational asthma (OA). The role of preexposure host factors, in particular airway responsiveness, on the incidence of OA has not been satisfactorily studied. A prospective cohort study of 417 apprentices in animal-health technology was conducted to investigate the incidence and determinants of probable OA. Questionnaire and skin-prick tests with common and work-specific allergens were administered on entry and at follow-up visits (up to three) from 8 to 44 mo after starting apprenticeship. Responsiveness to inhaled methacholine was assessed at baseline and at follow-up in apprentices who developed a new specific skin sensitization and in control subjects. Preexposure host characteristics and the school attended were compared between cases and all cohort subjects not meeting the criteria for probable OA. Twenty-eight apprentices satisfied the definition for probable OA, i.e., onset of immediate skin reactivity to > 1 occupational inhalant and > 3.2-fold decrease in the provocative concentration causing a 20% reduction in FEV(1) (PC(20)). The incidence of probable OA was 2.7% (28/1,043 person-years). Baseline immediate skin reactivity to pets (rate ratio [RR] 4.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.6 to 10.8), and bronchial responsiveness (PC(20) < or = 32 versus PC(20) > 32 mg/ ml) (RR = 2.5, 95% CI = 1.0 to 5.8) were associated with an increased risk of probable OA; a lower FEV(1) had an apparent, protective effect (RR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.43 to 0.78). It is concluded that apprentices in animal health show a high incidence of probable OA, and that preexposure airway caliber and responsiveness as well as sensitization to pets are associated with an increased risk.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it