The Direct Sum Map on Grassmannians and Jeu de Taquin for Increasing Tableaux
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The direct sum map on Grassmannians induces a K-theory pullback that defines the splitting coefficients. We geometrically explain an identity from Buch [“Grothendieck classes of quiver varieties.” Duke Mathematical Journal 115, no. 1 (2002): 75–103] between the splitting coefficients and the Schubert structure constants for products of Schubert structure sheaves. This is related to the topic of product and splitting coefficients for Schubert boundary ideal sheaves. Our main results extend jeu de taquin for increasing tableaux [Thomas and Yong. “A jeu de taquin theory for increasing tableaux, with applications to K-theoretic Schubert calculus.” Algebra and Number Theory Journal 3, no. 2 (2009): 121–48] by proving transparent analogues of Schützenberger’s [“La Correspondance de Robinson.” In Combinatoire et Représentation du Groupe Symétrique (Strasbourg, 1976), edited by D. Foata, 59–113. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 579. Berlin: Springer, 1977] fundamental theorems on well definedness of rectification. We then establish that jeu de taquin gives rules for each of these four kinds of coefficients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.026 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it