MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

SERCA activity is required for timely progression through G1/S

2001· article· en· W2084626899 on OpenAlexafffund
V. R. Simon, Michael F. Moran

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Proliferation · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic function and diabetes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Cancer InstituteMedical Research CouncilMedical Research Council Canada
KeywordsSERCAThapsigarginCell biologyEndoplasmic reticulumIntracellularCytosolCyclinMitosisCell cycleBiologyCyclin-dependent kinaseChemistryATPaseCellBiochemistryEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Changes in intracellular Ca2+ correlate with specific events in the cell cycle. Here we investigated the role of Ca2+ in the G1 phase. HEK 293 cells were arrested in mitosis and subjected to short-term treatments that alter Ca2+ homeostasis prior to their release into G1. Treatment with thapsigargin (TG), an irreversible inhibitor of the sarco-endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase (SERCA) lengthened the G1 phase. Moreover, TG treatment also resulted in a dramatic alteration in cellular morphology and attachment and in the reduction of MAPK activity and lower levels of cyclin D1 and cyclin E proteins. Treatments with reagents that transiently increase or decrease cytosolic Ca2+ or that temporarily inactivate SERCA did not alter any of the above parameters. Cells expressing a TG-resistant form of SERCA progressed normally through the G1/S transition after TG treatment. These results suggest that long-term SERCA inactivation affects cell cycle-dependent events and compromises progression through G1/S.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell ProliferationSame topicPancreatic function and diabetesFrench-language works237,207