SuperCritical Water-Cooled Nuclear Reactor With Intermediate Heat Exchangers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
At present, there are a number of Generation-IV nuclear reactor concepts under development worldwide, and the SuperCritical Water-cooled nuclear Reactor (SCWR) type is one of them. The main objective of developing SCWRs is to: 1) Increase the thermal efficiency of current Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs) from 30–35% to approximately 45–50%, and 2) Decrease capital and operational costs. SCW NPPs will have much higher operating parameters compared to current NPPs (i.e., pressures of about 25 MPa and outlet temperatures up to 625°C). This paper presents a SCWR single-reheat indirect cycle concept with intermediate heat exchangers. Similar to the current CANDU and Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) NPPs, heat exchangers separate the primary loop from the secondary loop. In this way, the primary loop can be completely enclosed in the reactor building. The nuclear activities stay within the reactor building, and there is a reduced possibility for radioactive contamination of equipment in the turbine building. As SCW NPPs will have much higher operating thermal hydraulic parameters this paper analyzes the technical challenges and higher costs typically associated with heat exchangers. The double-pipe heat exchanger is analyzed in depth to determine the heat-transfer surface area, number of units and physical dimensions of the heat exchanger. This study will help to determine whether the advantages of the indirect cycle justify implementation of heat exchangers at a SCW NPP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".