A genetic comparison of sympatric anadromous and resident Atlantic salmon
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Many studies have identified the importance of local adaptation in Atlantic salmon ( Salmo salar ) and the strong genetic differences that exist between allopatric or parapatric resident and anadromous populations. However, as truly sympatric migratory phenotypes of Atlantic salmon have not been studied, it remains unclear whether distinct genotypes previously associated with life history differences are maintained through reproductive isolation and subsequent genetic drift or through natural selection induced by different life history requirements. In this study, sympatric anadromous and resident Atlantic salmon were sampled from three Newfoundland (Canada) watersheds to evaluate the genetic divergence of these life history forms. Eight microsatellite loci were used to quantify genetic variation within and among populations. Metrics of genetic differentiation (exact tests for population differentiation, pairwise θ values) provide no evidence of genetic differentiation between some sympatric anadromous and resident phenotypes within a system with no history of segregation. In the remaining two watersheds, the observed differentiation appears to be a consequence of historical segregation rather than life history form. Nonetheless, these differences have been maintained in contemporary times for several generations. At broader spatial scales, resident salmon were more genetically divergent from one another than anadromous life history forms and were more closely related to anadromous salmon from within their watershed than to resident salmon from other watersheds. The study indicates that both life history forms can be maintained within a single population, but that sympatric populations of different life histories can maintain genetic differences for at least several generations after being reconnected.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".