NoteThe stringent response genes<i>relA</i>and<i>spoT</i>are important for<i>Escherichia coli</i>biofilms under slow-growth conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to see whether the stringent response was involved in biofilm formation, Escherichia coli DS291 (MG1655), and its isogenic relA spoT derivative were grown for 48 h in a chemostat at dilution rates of 0.025 and 0.25 h(-1) under serine limitation. The absence of the stringent response genes relA and spoT had little effect on the planktonic cell concentrations. However, a significant (P < 0.001) reduction in biofilm cell density of the relA spoT mutants was seen at a doubling time of 40 h. At a doubling time of 4 h, differences in biofilm cell density were not significant. Scanning confocal laser microscopy demonstrated the cell densities of microcolonies in the relA spoT mutant to be lower than those in the wild type. Using a microtiter plate assay, we found biofilm formation in relA spoT mutants to be similarly reduced in minimal media but to be enhanced in rich media (Luria-Bertani broth). No significant differences in biofilm formation were observed between wild type and isogenic relA mutants under any growth conditions. Overall, these results suggest that both stringent response genes relA and spoT are important in nutrient-limited biofilms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".