MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084750124 · doi:10.1359/jbmr.070105

Breast Cancer–Associated Gene 3 (<i>BCA3</i>) Is a Novel Rac1-Interacting Protein

2007· article· en· W2084750124 on OpenAlexafffund
Kuan-Ping Yu, Takashi Itokawa, Meiling Zhu, Sujata Syam, Arun Seth, Karl Insogna

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Bone and Mineral Research · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBone Metabolism and Diseases
Canadian institutionsWomen's College HospitalUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
FundersNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial ResearchBreast Cancer AllianceNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin DiseasesNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNational Institutes of HealthCanadian Breast Cancer Research Alliance
KeywordsRAC1BiologyIn vivoCell biologyMolecular biologyIn vitroGTPaseRHOBCancer researchSignal transductionBiochemistryGeneticsRHOA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

UNLABELLED: BCA3 was identified in a yeast two-hybrid screen as a novel Rac1-interacting partner in osteoclasts. BCA3 binds directly to Rac and, in vivo, binds GTP-Rac but not GDP-Rac. Perinuclear co-localization of BCA3 and Rac1 is observed in CSF-1-treated osteoclasts. Overexpression of BCA3 attenuates CSF-1-induced cell spreading. We conclude that BCA3 regulates CSF-1-dependent Rac activation. INTRODUCTION: Rac1, a ubiquitously expressed GTPase, is a mediator of colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF-1)-dependent actin remodeling in osteoclasts. Because the role of Rac in osteoclasts has not been fully defined, we undertook a yeast two-hybrid screen to identify Rac-interacting partners in these cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A yeast two-hybrid screen was undertaken using a cDNA library prepared from osteoclast-like cells as prey and either native Rac1 or constitutively active Rac1 (Q61L) as bait. Radiolabeled breast cancer-associated gene 3 (BCA3) protein constructs were generated in vitro using rabbit reticulate lysates and used in vitro binding assays with Rac1. In vivo binding was assessed using myc-tagged Rac1(Q61L) and HA-tagged BCA3. PBD pull-down assays were used to determine if GTP-loaded Rac1 preferentially bound BCA3. Co-localization of Rac1 and BCA3 in osteoclasts was assessed using confocal immunofluorescence. The functional significance of the BCA3-Rac1 interaction was assessed by examining the effect of overexpressing BCA3 in RAW 264.7 cells on the subsequent spreading response to CSF-1. RESULTS: One of three positive clones from the wildtype Rac1 screen and all three positive clones from the Rac1(Q61L) screen encoded the same protein, BCA3. BCA3 expression in osteoclasts was confirmed by RT-PCR and immunocytochemistry. BCA3 bound directly to Rac1 in vitro. Deletional analysis indicated that amino acids 76-125 in BCA3 are important for its ability to bind Rac. In vivo association of the two proteins was shown by co-immunoprecipitation of BCA3 and Rac1. Only GTP-bound-Rac but not GDP-bound Rac could interact with BCA3 in vivo. Confocal immunocytochemistry showed perinuclear co-localization of BCA3 and Rac1 in CSF-1-treated neonatal rat osteoclasts but not in resting osteoclasts. Overexpression of BCA3 markedly attenuated the spreading response to CSF-1 in RAW 264.7 cells. CONCLUSIONS: These data establish that BCA3 is a novel Rac1-interacting protein and suggest that it may influence the ability of Rac1 to remodel the actin cytoskeleton.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Bone and Mineral ResearchSame topicBone Metabolism and DiseasesFrench-language works237,207