Peripheral Airway Smooth Muscle Mechanics in Obstructive Airways Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine whether altered airway smooth muscle (ASM) contractility contributes to the pathogenesis of obstructive airways diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma. The passive and active mechanical properties of isolated human peripheral airways were measured in vitro by myography. The amount of ASM was measured by morphometry. Pulmonary function was assessed before surgery by the FEV(1) (%pred) and the FEV(1)/ FVC (%). Fifteen airways were studied from nonobstructed (NOB) patients, and 15 from obstructed (OB, FEV(1)/FVC < 70%) patients (62 +/- 10 yr, mean +/- SD). The maximal isometric force (Fmax), stress (Fmax/ASM), airway diameter at Lmax (Dmax), maximal isotonic shortening (%Lmax), and normalized airway smooth muscle (ASM/Dmax) were determined in all patients. There was a significant correlation between Fmax and FEV(1) (%pred) (r = -0.579, p < 0.004), between Fmax and FEV(1)/FVC (%) (r = -0.720, p < 0.003), and between stress and FEV(1)/FVC (%) (-0.611, p < 0.002). There was no correlation between isotonic shortening and either measure of pulmonary function. A positive correlation was found between force and shortening (r = 0.442, p < 0.05), and stress and shortening (r = 0.538, p < 0.01). Both force and stress were significantly increased (p < 0.05) in OB (Fmax = 0.87 +/- 0.8 g, stress = 76 +/- 47 mN/mm(2)) versus NOB (Fmax = 0.42 +/- 0.18 g, stress = 51 +/- 21 mN/mm(2)) patients, while isotonic shortening was not different between the two groups. ASM and ASM/Dmax were both significantly increased in the OB patient group (p < 0.05). These results suggest that obstructive airways disease is associated with an increase in the ability of the ASM to generate force. (Values represent means +/- SD.)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".