MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Daily physical movement and bone mineral density among a mixed racial cohort of women

2002· article· en· W2084795703 on OpenAlexaff
Linda S. Pescatello, Daren Anderson, Dino G. Costanzo, Latha Dulipsingh, Mary Jane De Souza

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and osteoporosis research
Canadian institutionsCoalition for Research in Women's HealthUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBone mineralMedicineCalcaneusDemographyBone densityPhysical activityHeelOsteoporosisPhysical therapyInternal medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: The impact of lifestyle physical activity on bone mineral density (BMD) is unclear. We examined the influence of physical activities typical of everyday life on BMD among 151 women (52.0 +/- 0.9 yr). These women were of low socioeconomic status, and 57.6% were Hispanic, 17.2% black, and 24.5% white. METHODS: BMD was measured at the calcaneus by ultrasound with a Hologic Sahara sonometer. We measured physical activity with two questions from the Yale Physical Activity Survey that assessed h x d(-1) spent in motion typical of the past month and number of flights of stairs climbed up daily. Multivariate ANCOVA adjusted for adiposity and nutrients and medications known to influence BMD determined whether BMD differed between categories of physical activity (<2 vs > or = 2 flights x d(-1) and <7 vs > or = 7 h x d(-1)), menopausal status (pre- vs post-), and ethnic group (white vs nonwhite). RESULTS: Among the premenopausal women (N = 63, 43.2+/-0.9 yr), adjusted mean calcaneal BMD and BMD T-score were similar between categories of stair climbing and accumulated daily movement regardless of ethnic origin (P > 0.05). Among the postmenopausal women (N = 88, 58.1 +/- 1.0 yr), adjusted mean calcaneal BMD (0.561 +/- 0.019 g x cm(-2) vs 0.503 +/- 0.016) (P = 0.022) and BMD T-score (-0.172 +/- 0.166 vs -0.695 +/- 0.143) (P = 0.020) were higher with more flights of stairs climbed daily in the Hispanic and black women only. Similarly, calcaneal BMD (0.579 +/- 0.023 g x cm(-2) vs 0.505 +/- 0.014) (P = 0.010) and BMD T-score (-0.020 +/- 0.209 vs -0.678 +/- 0.129) (P = 0.010) were higher with greater amounts of daily movement in only the older Hispanic and black women. CONCLUSION: Lifestyle physical activity positively impacted BMD indicators in a mixed racial cohort of postmenopausal women. Older Hispanic and black women should be encouraged to engage in physical activities typical of everyday life to attenuate age-related bone loss.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicBone health and osteoporosis researchFrench-language works237,207