Complexation Dynamics of Xanthone and Thioxanthone to β-Cyclodextrin Derivatives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The complexation dynamics of xanthone to substituted β-cyclodextrins (CDs) and of thioxanthone to β-CD was studied by directly following the relocation of the excited triplet-state ketones from the CD cavity to the aqueous phase. Equilibrium constants for the ground-state complexation of both ketones with CDs were determined from fluorescence studies. The complexation efficiency and dynamics of thioxanthone with β-CD were the same as previously observed for the xanthone/β-CD system. Substitution of some of the hydrogens on the alcohol groups by methyl moieties at both entrances to the β-CD cavity increased the equilibrium constant for ground-state xanthone, but decreased that for the excited triplet state, leading to a larger difference for the binding behavior of these two electronic states of the guest. Addition of one pendant arm containing a carboxyl moiety to the rim where xanthone is bound does not change the binding efficiency of the ground state or the binding dynamics of triplet xanthone. In contrast, when this arm contains an ethyl ester moiety, the binding efficiencies of both the ground and excited triplet states are increased. The higher binding constant for triplet xanthone is due to an increase of the association rate constant and a decrease for the dissociation rate constant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".