Evidence that ventilatory rhythmogenesis in the frog involves two distinct neuronal oscillators
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Rana catesbeiana the upper airways are used for two distinct yet highly coordinated ventilatory behaviours: buccal ventilation and lung inflation cycles. How these behaviours are generated and coordinated is unknown. The purpose of this study was to identify putative rhythmogenic brainstem loci involved in these ventilatory behaviours. We surveyed the isolated postmetamorphic brainstem to determine sites where local depolarization, produced by microinjecting the non-NMDA glutamate receptor agonist, AMPA, augmented the ventilatory motor patterns. Two sites were identified: a caudal site, at the level of cranial nerve (CN) X, where AMPA injections caused increased buccal burst frequency but abolished lung bursts, and a rostral site, between the levels of CN VIII and IX, where injections increased the frequency of both types of ventilatory bursts. These two sites were further examined using GABA microinjections to locally inhibit cells. GABA injected into the caudal site suppressed the buccal rhythm but the lung rhythm continued, albeit at a different frequency. When GABA was injected into the rostral site the lung bursts were abolished but the buccal rhythm continued. When the two sites were physically separated by transection, both rostral and caudal brainstem sections were capable of rhythmogenesis. The results suggest the respiratory network within the amphibian brainstem is composed of at least two distinct but interacting oscillators, the buccal and lung oscillators. These putative oscillators may provide a promising experimental model for studying coupled oscillators in vertebrates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".