Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Brief Central venous access is essential for patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Traditionally, tunneled silastic catheters have been inserted in these patients. However, changes in resource allocation, resulting in reduced surgery and surgeon time and decreasing toxicity associated with ASCT, have caused changes in venous access needs and options. This led the advanced practice nurse in the transplant program to evaluate other central access devices, which resulted in the introduction of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) for this patient population. This study reports the results of a retrospective analysis comparing efficacy and complication profiles between 50 patients with the traditional Hickman catheter and 70 patients with PICCs. Central venous access is essential for patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Traditionally, tunneled silastic catheters have been inserted in these patients. However, changes in resource allocation, resulting in reduced surgery and surgeon time and decreasing toxicity associated with ASCT, have caused changes in venous access needs and options. This led the advanced practice nurse in the transplant program to evaluate other central access devices, which resulted in the introduction of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) for this patient population. This study reports the results of a retrospective analysis comparing efficacy and complication profiles between 50 patients with the traditional Hickman catheter and 70 patients with PICCs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it