MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084929610 · doi:10.1071/rdv25n1ab214

214 EFFECT OF OVARIAN SUPERSTIMULATION ON EXPRESSION OF GENES ASSOCIATED WITH THE OOCYTE DEVELOPMENTAL COMPETENCE OF NELORE COWS

2012· article· en· W2084929610 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rafael Augusto Satrapa, E. M. Razza, Antônio Guilherme Roncada Pupulim, A. C. S. Castilho, B. Loureiro, J. S. Ticianelli, Marcel Cerqueira César Machado, Patrícia Kubo Fontes, R. L. Ereno, M. F. Pegorer, C. M. Barros

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndocrinologyBlastocystInternal medicineBiologyOocyteEmbryoOviductAndrologyEmbryogenesisMedicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The P36 protocol has contributed to the genetic improvement of Brazilian herd through its successful use in embryo transfer programs. We aimed to investigate the effect of P36 protocol on embryo yield and mRNA expression of genes correlated with the competence of cumulus–oocyte complex (COC): receptors of FSH (FSHR), EGF (EGFR), and pentraxin 3 (PTX3) in cumulus cells; receptors of LH (LHR) and angiotensin 2 (AT2) in granulosa cells; and GDF9, BMP15, and histone H2A (H2A) in oocytes. Multiparous Nelore cows were allocated in control and P36 groups. Control group (non-superovulated, n = 15) received a progesterone intravaginal device (P4, 1.0 g, Primer®, Tecnopec, Sao Paulo, Brazil) and 2.5 mg of oestradiol benzoate (EB, IM, BER-BE®, Syntex, Buenos Aires, Argentina) at a random day of the oestrous cycle (Day 0). A PGF2a analogue (150 mg d-cloprostenol, IM, Prolise®, RARS SRL) was administered (Day 8) and Primer® was removed. The P36 group (n = 10) received a Primer® and 2.0 mg of EB (Day 0). The FSH treatment (160 mg Folltropin®, Bioniche Animal Health, Ontario, Canada) was initiated at decreasing doses: 40, 30, 20, and 10% of the total dose twice daily for 4 days (Day 5). The PGF2a analogue was administered (Day 8) and after 36 h primer was removed. Animal slaughter to ovary collection was performed 12 h after Primer® removal (Day 9). Some of the oocytes were matured (TCM199), fertilized with Nelore semen (n = 6), and cultured (SOF-synthetic oviduct fluid) to the blastocyst stage. Embryos were removed from culture (Day 6), allocated in 5 pools with 5 embryos in each group, and subjected to RNA extraction. Remaining oocytes were denuded from cumulus and zona pellucida (vortex and Protease®, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Pools of 20 oocytes and of their respective cumulus cells (n = 6 pools; control group and n = 4 pools, P36 group) were subjected to RNA extraction (RNeasy kit, Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). Gene expression was performed by real-time RT-PCR using oligo-dT in reverse transcription and bovine-specific primers. Expression of cyclophilin A was used as endogenous control. Change to developmental rates to the blastocyst stage and transcript abundance were compared by t-test and significance was considered when P < 0.05. Blastocyst rates were also similar (P > 0.05) in groups P36 (40/99; 40%) and control (16/43; 37%). Expression of H2A, EGFR, FSHR, and PTX3 in cumulus cells did not differ (P > 0.05) among treatment groups. The expression of GDF9 and BMP15 in cumulus cells was higher (P < 0.05) in the P36 group, but in oocytes these transcripts were more expressed in the control group (P < 0.05). Although important genes (GDF9 and BMP15) were less expressed in oocytes from superstimulated cows, the maintenance of H2A in oocytes, as well as PTX3, EGFR, and FSHR, and the increases in GDF9 and BMP15 expression in cumulus cells do not seem to affect oocyte competence due to the similar embryo yield of both groups. Supported by FAPESP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.303
Threshold uncertainty score0.354

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207