Determining Salinity Threshold Level for Castor Bean Emergence and Stand Establishment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Castor bean ( Ricinus communis L.) is grown on marginal lands that can be prone to having medium to high salt concentrations. This study was done to identify a salinity threshold level for castor bean emergence and stand establishment. Seedlings were first cultured in organic matter–soil mixed media at different salinity levels (0.5, 3.6, 7.1, 10.4, and 13.6 dS m −1 ) and then transplanted into pots filled with soils at similar salinity levels (0.4, 3.6, 7.1, 10.4, and 13.6 dS m −1 ). Emergence, survival, seedling growth, nutrient accumulation, and leaf photosynthetic parameters were determined. The salinity threshold level was identified at 7.1 dS m −1 At this salinity level or lower, the emergence rate and survival rate reached 75% or higher; and seedling growth, nutrient accumulation, and leaf photosynthetic parameters were not severely affected. As the salinity level increased to 10.4 and 13.6 dS m −1 , emergence rate dropped to below 70%, and survival rate below 50%. Photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance were reduced by up to 66% and chlorophyll reading by up to 24%. Nutrient uptake and accumulation were also significantly reduced at these two salinity levels. Our results indicate that castor bean could be cultured in plastic seedling trays filled with organic matter–soil mixed seedling media and then transplanted into conventional soils provided that the salinity levels in seedling media and conventional soils are ≤7.1 dS m −1
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".