Independence of net water flux from paracellular permeability in the intestine of<i>Fundulus heteroclitus</i>, a euryhaline teleost
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Paracellular permeability and absorptive water flux across the intestine of the euryhaline killifish were investigated using in vitro gut sac preparations from seawater- and freshwater-acclimated animals. The permeability of polyethylene glycol (PEG), a well-established paracellular probe, was measured using trace amounts of radiolabelled oligomers of three different molecular sizes (PEG-400, PEG-900 and PEG-4000) at various times after satiation feeding. All three PEG molecules were absorbed, with permeability declining as a linear function of increasing hydrodynamic radius. Response patterns were similar in seawater and freshwater preparations, though water absorption and PEG-900 permeability were greater in the latter. Despite up to 4-fold variations in absorptive water flux associated with feeding and fasting (highest at 1-3 h, lowest at 12-24 h and intermediate at 1-2 weeks post-feeding), there were no changes in PEG permeability for any size oligomer. When PEG permeability was measured in the opposite direction (i.e. serosal to mucosal) from net water flux, it was again unchanged. HgCl(2) (10(-3) mol l(-1)), a putative blocker of aquaporins, eliminated absorptive water flux yet increased PEG-4000 permeability by 6- to 8-fold in both freshwater and seawater preparations. Experimentally raising the serosal osmolality by addition of 300 mmol l(-1) mannitol increased the absorptive water flux rate 10-fold, but did not alter PEG permeability. Under these conditions, HgCl(2) reduced absorptive water flux by 60% and again increased PEG permeability by 6- to 8-fold in both freshwater and seawater preparations. Clearly, there was no influence of solvent drag on PEG movement. The putative paracellular blocker 2,4,6-triaminopyrimidine (TAP, 20 mmol l(-1)) had no effect on net water flux or PEG permeability. We conclude that PEG and water move by separate pathways; absorptive water transport probably occurs via a transcellular route in the intestine of Fundulus heteroclitus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".