Analysis of Active Joint Failure in Parallel Robot Manipulators
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, the effect of active joint failure on the mobility, velocity, and static force of parallel robot manipulators is investigated. Two catastrophic active joint failure types are considered: joint jam and actuator force loss. To investigate the effect of failure on mobility, the Gru¨bler’s mobility equation is modified to take into account the kinematic constraints imposed by various branches in the manipulator. In the case of joint jam, the manipulator loses the ability to move and apply force in a specific portion of its task space; while in the case of actuator force loss, the manipulator gains an unconstrained motion in a specific portion of the task space in which an externally applied force cannot be resisted by the actuator forces. The effect of joint jam and actuator force loss on the velocity and on the force capabilities of parallel manipulators is investigated by examining the change in the Jacobian matrix, its inverse, and transposes. It is shown that the reduced velocity and force capabilities after joint jam and loss of actuator force could be determined using the null space vectors of the transpose of the Jacobian matrix and its inverse. Computer simulation is conducted to demonstrate the application of the developed methodology in determining the post-failure trajectory of a 3-3 six-degree-of-freedom Stewart-Gough manipulator, when encountering active joint jam and actuator force loss.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".