MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W208505544

Fortification of dairy milk with docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) through feed supplementation of dairy cattle feed - a new horizon in dairy industry.

2012· article· en· W208505544 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ijaz Ahmad, Umm E. Aiman, K. B. Marwat

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicFatty Acid Research and Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDocosahexaenoic acidFortificationFood scienceBiologyBiotechnologyDairy cattlePolyunsaturated fatty acidAnimal scienceFatty acidBiochemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) is an omega-3 fatty acid essential for structural development of the brain and eyes in the infants and maintenance of normal vision and neural functions in adults. DHA is also vital for the integrity of heart and vascular system, and is implicated in relieving inflammatory conditions and arthritis pain and in preventing cancer. Human body cannot synthesize DHA sufficiently, and most common source of DHA is marine food. Lowest breast-milk DHA values (0.06–0.14%) in nursing mothers found in Pakistan and inland areas of Canada have been attributed to a lack of dietary intake of marine food. In Canada, a novel approach of fortifying the dairy milk by supplementing the cattle feed with DHA-rich herring meal has been used to enhance the dietary intake of DHA in the country. In Pakistan a homegrown source of DHA is needed for supplementing cattle feed is needed to augment the low availability of marine food sources, and seems feasible to cultivate the marine red alga Crypthecodinium cohnii, which is a prolific producer of DHA and has been used as a non toxic pharmaceutical supplement. Crypthecodinium cohnii addition to duck feed has been shown to result in a significant increase in the DHA content of the fed animal. The current study deals with developing a sustainable mass culturing system for C. cohnii in Pakistan, using both bioreactors and open pond fields. The fortification of cattle feed is intended for both large scientifically managed “smart” dairy farms, and small to medium size family owned farms in different parts of the country. Our research is focused on developing protocols for custom designing the DHA enrichment of cattle feeds used in the area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.319
Threshold uncertainty score0.219

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Animal and Plant SciencesSame topicFatty Acid Research and HealthFrench-language works237,207