HIV/AIDS: Testing and risk behaviors among Britsh Columbia’s rural Aboriginal population
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Over the last decade, there has been growing concern in the public health sector over the spread of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) in Canada's Aboriginal population. However, there continues to be a general lack of HIV awareness and its risk factors in Aboriginal communities. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This study investigated HIV testing patterns, perceptions and risk factors within 7 community organizations through the use of face-to-face interviews. The objectives of this research project were to 1) describe the prevalence of HIV testing; 2) describe issues concerning confidentiality related to the HIV testing; 3) identify the prevalence of risk factors for HIV transmission; and, 4) build research capacity in the Aboriginal community. RESULTS: Two hundred and nineteen Aboriginal persons participated in interviews. Off-reserve residents (pOR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.29 - 0.80) were significantly more likely to use illicit drugs than reserve residents. Sixty percent of participants had reported undergoing HIV testing at some point. Two-spirited participants (pOR: 16.1, 95% CI: 2.13-121.06), those who previously tested for a Sexually Transmitted Disease (pOR: 2.94, 95% CI: 1.73-4.98), those currently using cocaine (pOR: 3.88, 95% CI: 1.25 - 12.0), and those who reported to "never", or "some of the time" use clean needles (pOR: 11.0, 95% CI: 1.36- 88.66) were significantly more likely to undergoing HIV testing. On-reserve residents (pOR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.35-0.87) and respondents older than 40 years of age (pOR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.19 - 0.86) were less likely to undergo HIV testing. CONCLUSIONS: Participants with HIV risk factors are more likely to be tested for HIV in rural areas and confidentiality issues were not a barrier to testing for most participants. Off-reserve residents were more likely to undergo HIV testing, the reasons for which require additional research. Finally, public health units are often under-utilized as locations to seek testing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".