Integrin-linked Kinase Regulates Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase and Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression in an NF-κB-dependent Manner
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nitric oxide (NO) and prostaglandins are produced as a result of the stimulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and cyclooxygenase-2, respectively, in response to cytokines or lipopolysaccharide (LPS). We demonstrate that the activity of integrin-linked kinase (ILK) is stimulated by LPS activation in J774 macrophages. Inhibition of ILK activity by dominant-negative ILK or a highly selective small molecule ILK inhibitor, in epithelial cells or LPS-stimulated J774 cells and murine macrophages, resulted in inhibition of iNOS expression and NO synthesis. LPS stimulates the phosphorylation of IkappaB on Ser-32 and promotes its degradation. Inhibition of ILK suppressed this LPS-stimulated IkappaB phosphorylation and degradation. Similarly, ILK inhibition suppressed the LPS-stimulated iNOS promoter activity. Mutation of the NF-kappaB sites in the iNOS promoter abolished LPS- and ILK-mediated regulation of iNOS promoter activity. Overexpression of ILK-stimulated NF-kappaB activity and inhibition of ILK or protein kinase B (PKB/Akt) suppressed this activation. We conclude that ILK can regulate NO production in macrophages by regulating iNOS expression through a pathway involving PKB/Akt and NF-kappaB. Furthermore, we also demonstrate that ILK activity is required for LPS stimulated cyclooxygenase-2 expression in murine and human macrophages. These findings implicate ILK as a potential target for anti-inflammatory applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".