Bond Multiplicity in Transition-Metal Complexes: Applications of Two-Electron Valence Indices
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the present study the applicability of the bond multiplicities from the Nalewajski and Mrozek valence indices was demonstrated for a variety of transition metal-based systems. The Nalewajski-Mrozek valence indices and bond multiplicity indices have been implemented in the Amsterdam Density Functional program. Selected examples comprise the carbonyl complexes (selected tetra- and hexacarbonyls, binary monocarbonyls of the first-row transition metals), phosphines, the ligands' trans-influence, as well as multiple metal-ligand and metal-metal bonds. The results show that the calculated bond multiplicity indices correspond well to experimental predictions based on bond lengths and vibrational frequencies for all discussed classes of complexes. Almost perfect linear correlation between the bond indices and vibrational frequencies was observed for carbonyls and the oxo complexes; the calculated bond multiplicity reproduces the accepted order for the trans-influence of different ligands, rationalizes unusually low vibrational freqencies in the [OsO 3N] (-)complex compared to other nitrido complexes, explains the geometrical asymmetry in the MoO 3 solid, and confirms the multiple character of the metal-metal bond in the [Re 2Cl 8] (2-) complex. Thus, the Nalewajski and Mrozek method can be successfully used as a supplementary analysis tool for electronic structure for studies involving transition metal complexes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it