MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085240874 · doi:10.2118/132485-pa

Steam Flooding of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs: Basic Concepts and Recovery Mechanisms

2010· article· en· W2085240874 on OpenAlexaffabout
Alireza Mollaei, Brij Maini

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Canadian Petroleum Technology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersDirektorat Riset and Pengembangan, Universitas IndonesiaIndian Institute of Technology KanpurUniversity of Texas at Austin
KeywordsPetroleum engineeringSteam injectionFracture (geology)Matrix (chemical analysis)CarbonateEnhanced oil recoveryThermal conductionPressure gradientDissolutionViscosityPorosityTemperature gradientGeologyEnvironmental scienceMaterials scienceGeotechnical engineeringChemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A review of important issues in steam injection in naturally fractured reservoirs (NFRs) is presented. The effect of temperature on physical properties of crude oils and rocks and the thermo-chemical alteration of crude oil are discussed. The recovery of oil from NFRs can be modelled as a two step process: first the oil is expelled from the matrix blocks through mechanisms that impose a pressure gradient within each matrix block and then it is swept through the fracture network to a production well by mechanisms that impose a pressure gradient within the fracture network. The recovery mechanisms associated with steam injection in NFRs and their characteristic times are presented. The most important recovery mechanism in matrix blocks is differential thermal expansion between oil and the matrix pore volume and the strongest mechanism in fracture network is the reduction of viscosity ratio (µo/µw). The matrix oil recovery mechanisms are relatively independent of oil gravity, making steam an equally attractive recovery process in fractured light and heavy oil reservoirs. The mechanism and impact of CO2 generation during steam injection in carbonate reservoirs are discussed. The rate of CO2 generation is controlled by the rate of heat conduction from fracture into the matrix. For a specific reservoir the rate of heat conduction is a function of temperature and injection rate of steam and these can be optimized to make use of the in situ generated CO2. Introduction Heavy oil in naturally fractured carbonate reservoirs is an important resource, which accounts for one-third of total heavy oil worldwide. Many fractured reservoirs in the Middle East, former Soviet Union and Canada are candidates for thermal heavy oil recovery. Steam injection processes, which have been used extensively to recover heavy oil from non-fractured reservoirs, were not applied to fractured reservoirs until recently. This was primarily based on the belief that the injected steam would bypass the oil through the fractures and would be ineffective in recovering the oil. However, the results of experimental, theoretical and pilot tests which have appeared in the literature since early 1980s, show the feasibility of heavy oil recovery from fractured reservoirs using steam injection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.963

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Canadian Petroleum TechnologySame topicEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207