Aberrant G protein signaling in nervous system tumors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECT: Guanosine triphosphate (GTP)-binding proteins, also known as G proteins, play important roles in the regulation of cell growth and differentiation by transmitting intracellular signals from cell surface receptors. In this paper, the authors review G protein signaling in general and its aberrations in four human nervous system tumors. METHODS: In the nervous system, four tumor types have been associated with aberrant G protein signaling. The first tumor type includes astrocytomas, which have increased levels of the activated form of the small G protein, p21-ras, without primary oncogenic p21-ras mutations. The likely source for increased p21-ras activity in sporadically occurring astrocytomas is overexpressed or constitutively activated growth factor receptors, whereas in neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1)-associated astrocytomas, the source is a loss of expression of neurofibromin, a major inactivator of p21-ras (ras-GTPase activating protein [GAP]). The second type of tumor associated with aberrant G protein signaling includes sporadic and NF1-associated neurofibromas and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors, which also have increased p21-ras activity due to a loss of neurofibromin expression. The third tumor type includes subependymal giant cell astrocytomas as part of the tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). These tumors display a loss of tuberin expression due to germline mutations in the TSC2 gene. Tuberin functions as an inactivator of the small G protein rap1B (rap1-GAP) and, hence, loss of its expression could lead to increased rap1B activity. In addition to TSC-associated tumors, the authors demonstrate that the majority of sporadically occurring astrocytomas display either loss of tuberin or overexpression of rap1B. This suggests that increased rap1B activity, which can augment p21-ras-mediated signals, also contributes to G protein-mediated aberrant signaling in sporadically occurring astrocytomas. The fourth tumor type includes a significant subset of pituitary adenomas that show constitutive activation of the G alpha subunit of the large heterotrimeric G s protein, which is involved in hormone receptor signaling. The net result of this aberrant activation is increased cyclic adenosine monophosphate and mitogenic tumor-promoting signals. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' review of G protein signaling and aberrations in this process is made with the long-term view that increased understanding of relevant signaling pathways will eventually lead to novel biological targeted therapies against these tumors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".