Modified K-Line in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Insufficient Decompression of Cervical Laminoplasty
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective single-center study. OBJECTIVE: To clarify preoperative factors predicting unsatisfactory indirect decompression after laminoplasty in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Many authors have shown that inadequate indirect decompression after laminoplasty can inhibit neural recovery and should be considered a complication. We previously demonstrated that residual anterior compression of the spinal cord (ACS) impaired recovery of upper extremity motor function. Although the K-line has been established as a predictive index indicating that laminoplasty is required in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, it remains unclear what preoperative factors can predict insufficient posterior cord decompression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. METHODS: Forty-six consecutive patients who underwent laminoplasty for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy at our hospital were reviewed. A modified K-line was defined as the line connecting the midpoints of the spinal cord at C2 and C7 on a T1-weighted sagittal magnetic resonance image. We also determined the minimum interval between the tip of local kyphosis and a line connecting the midpoint of the cord at the level of the inferior endplates of C2 and C7 (INTmin) on the midsagittal image. Data analysis involved logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to select the most valuable index for predicting postoperative ACS. RESULTS: Ten patients had ACS immediately after laminoplasty. Logistic regression analysis showed that INTmin was a significant predictive factor for the occurrence of postoperative ACS (odds ratio = 0.485; 95% confidence interval = 0.29-0.81; P = 0.02). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.871. A cutoff of 4.0 mm had a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 80.6% for prediction of postoperative ACS. CONCLUSION: The parameter INTmin correlated with the occurrence of postoperative ACS. A cutoff point of 4.0 mm is most appropriate for alerting spine surgeons to a high likelihood of postoperative ACS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".