Identification of Cre Residues Involved in Synapsis, Isomerization, and Catalysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Cre protein of bacteriophage P1 is a tyrosine recombinase and catalyzes recombination via formation of a covalent protein-DNA complex and a Holliday junction intermediate. Several co-crystal structures of Cre bound to its target lox site have provided novel insights into its biochemical activities. We have used these structures to guide the mutagenesis of several Cre residues that contact the lox spacer region and/or are involved in intersubunit protein-protein interactions. None of the mutant proteins had significant defects in DNA binding, DNA bending, or strand-specific initiation of recombination. We have identified novel functions of several amino acids that are involved in three aspects of the Cre reaction. 1) Single mutation of several NH2-terminal basic residues that contact the spacer region of loxP caused the accumulation of Holliday junction (HJ) intermediates but only a modest impairment of recombination. These residues may be involved in the isomerization of the Holliday intermediate. 2) We identified three new residues (Arg-118, Lys-122, and Glu-129) that are involved in synapsis. Cre R118A, K122A, and E129Q were catalytically competent. 3) Mutations E129R, Q133H, and K201A inactivated catalysis by the protein. The function of these Cre residues in recombination is discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".