On the effect of gravitational and hydrodynamic forces on particle motion in a quiescent fluid at high particle Reynolds numbers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Trajectories of 5 and 10 mm metallic and plastic particles in a quiescent liquid during their sedimentation toward a plate were studied using experimental and numerical means, and the influence of gravity, drag, added mass, and history forces were evaluated. Variations of particle diameter and density allowed measurements at Reynolds numbers, based on the impact velocity, in the range of 1 000 to 13 000. A computer model was developed and the Lagrangian equation of particle motion was solved. The results showed that the combination of gravity, drag, and added mass forces are important for the simulation of the motion of small particles for the duration of their flight from the starting point to the wall impact, in the range of particle Reynolds numbers between 1000 and 5000. Comparison of the simulation results with the data showed that the predicted trajectories underestimated the experimental observations by about 1% to 4.3%. When the history force was included in the governing equation, however, excellent agreement between the measured and predicted particle trajectory was obtained. Experimental results for the motion of large particles showed oscillations in the time history of particle velocity when the particle Reynolds number was in the range of 3 000 to 13 000. Repeating the experiment, and averaging the data of a large number of experiments, yielded averaged curves for the particle velocity that did not show oscillatory values. In this case, good agreement between numerical and experimental data was observed. The study also shows that at high particle Reynolds numbers, the effect of the history force becomes negligibly small.PACS No.: 47.55kf
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".