MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085426575 · doi:10.1017/s0317167100006430

Grisel Syndrome in Adult Patients. Report of Two Cases and Review of the Literature

2009· review· en· W2085426575 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Karam Youssef, Daniel Shédid

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Canadian institutionsHôpital Notre-DameCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAction (physics)MedicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationPsychologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Grisel's syndrome involves the subluxation of the atlantoaxial joint from inflammatory ligamentous laxity following an infectious process in the head or neck 1 .It rarely occurs in adults.In children, the treatment is first medical with the need for immobilization and sometimes internal fixation depending on the stability of C1-C2.In this paper we report two cases of Grisel syndrome in adults. CASE REPORT Case 1A 50-year-old female intravenous drug user presented with neck pain and electrical sensations in the upper and lower limbs on neck flexion (Lhermitte's sign).There was no history of head and neck trauma but she reported tonsilopharyngitis one to two weeks prior to consultation.Her physical examination was normal except for a positive Lhermitte's sign.Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the cervical spine revealed a mass infiltrating the posterior subligamentous region of the anterior arch of C1, the odontoid and the body of C2 and compressing the bulbo-medullary junction (Figure 1).and an increase of the atlanto-dental interval (Figure 2).The CT-scan did not show any bony destruction or a rotatory subluxation (Figure 3).The patient received antibiotics with wide spectrum coverage and was stabilized in a Halo vest after closed reduction.The radiological follow-up revealed a decrease in the prevertebral collection as well as a decrease in the spinal cord compression (Figure 4 and 5).After three months the patient fell and presented to the emergency room with loosening of the Halo.She was neurologically intact but the flexion cervical x-ray revealed a C1-C2 instability (Figure 6).The patient underwent a C1/C2 fusion, with C1 lateral mass screw and a pars screw (Figure 7).At her last follow-up (five months), the patient was doing very well and was pain-free.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences NeurologiquesSame topicSpinal Fractures and Fixation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207