MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2085432553 · doi:10.2118/140297-ms

Mist Drilling in Low-Pressured, Highly Fractured Carbonates Improves Well Test Results and Fracture Identification from Image Logs

2011· article· en· W2085432553 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Norlizah Mohd Nor, Maria A. Balzarini, M. A. A. Siddiqui

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMistDrillingPetroleum engineeringDrilling fluidGeologyUnderbalanced drillingEnvironmental scienceEngineeringMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Underbalanced drilling (UBD) is an effective technique used to prevent severe fluid losses typically encountered when drilling through vuggy and fractured carbonates. This paper discusses the successful application of UBD to improve drilling performance and data acquisition quality in an ultra heavy oil carbonate resource located in Alberta, Canada. Logistical challenges associated with mobilizing UBD equipment to a remote location during extreme winter conditions are also presented. A series of appraisal drilling campaigns were conducted over a four year period in the ultra heavy oil-bearing Grosmont carbonates to acquire subsurface data in support of field development planning. Prior to 2010, the primary drilling fluid used was water-based polymer mud and, when heavy losses were encountered, polymer-based lost-circulation material. The formation damage caused by drilling with these materials hampered hydrology testing and masked image log responses resulting in an inaccurate view of the reservoir architecture and an inappropriate development concept. During the winter 2010 drilling campaign, a change was made from overbalanced to underbalanced drilling using mist in the bitumen-saturated carbonates. The main objective of mist drilling was to reduce near-wellbore damage and improve interpretability of hydrology test data. The application of mist drilling was proven to be operationally feasible despite the challenges posed by severe winter weather conditions during drilling, which are exacerbated by the poor infrastructure surrounding the remote Grosmont well locations. Excellent quality image logs and much improved hydrology test data were obtained in the mist-drilled wells compared to appraisal wells drilled overbalanced in past campaigns. Skin factors were reduced by a factor of 100 and fractures became more discernible on image logs. Consequently, understanding of permeability architecture in this heavily fractured carbonate reservoir was greatly enhanced. The successful experience with mist drilling in these fractured carbonates paves the way for better fracture identification and reservoir characterization for the resource. The data acquired from the UBD wells have impacted key decisions related to technology testing and future development planning for the Grosmont lease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.105

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.173
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDrilling and Well Engineering→French-language works237,207→