Factors affecting the freeze-fracture morphology of in vivo polyhydroxyalkanoate granules
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Interesting morphologies were observed when Comamonas acidovorans containing polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) of various compositions was freeze-fractured at temperatures far below the glass transition temperatures of PHA. In vivo granules of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) comparatively showed the most ductility, and could be stretched extensively. Contrary to the uniform needle-type deformation shown by the poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) homopolymer when fractured at -110 degrees C, copolymers containing 3-hydroxyvalerate units showed various deformation structures. Similar observations were made when in vivo granules of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate) were freeze-fractured, although the ductility of the latter was much reduced. In addition, it was found that fracturing at -160 degrees C resulted in decreased ductility of the PHA granules with the concomitant increase in the number of mushroom-type deformation structures. Our results suggest that PHA granules with higher resistance to freeze-fracture deformation show less ductility, and therefore produce the mushroom-type morphology. This is the first report on the freeze-fracture morphology of PHA copolymers containing short-chain-length monomers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".