MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085527445 · doi:10.1309/ajcpci1ffe2drxiv

Cytoplasmic Expression of Nucleophosmin Accurately Predicts Mutation in the Nucleophosmin Gene in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Normal Karyotype

2009· article· en· W2085527445 on OpenAlexaff
Jennifer Luo, Connie Qi, Wei Xu, Suzanne Kamel‐Reid, Joseph Brandwein, Hong Chang

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNPM1NucleophosminMyeloid leukemiaExonCancer researchMutationGene mutationBiologyKaryotypeLeukemiaMyeloidMolecular biologyGeneGeneticsChromosome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mutations in the nucleophosmin (NPM1) exon 12 resulting in delocalization of NPM1 into the cytoplasm occur in 50% to 60% of acute myeloid leukemia cases with a normal karyotype (AML-NK). As recent studies suggest such patients have a favorable prognosis and there are discordant reports of the immunohistochemical detection of cytoplasmic NPM1 (NPMc+) for predicting NPM1 gene mutations, we correlated the immunohistochemical detection of NPMc+, NPM1 gene mutations, and prognosis in 57 cases of AML-NK. All 31 NPMc+ cases (54% of total) had NPM1 mutations, but none of the 26 nucleus-restricted (NPMc-) cases (46% of total) had NPM1 mutations (P < .0001). NPM1 mutations were correlated with FLT3-internal tandem duplication (ITD) (P = .0062), absence of CD34 (P = .0001), and absence of CD7 (P = .041). There was a favorable survival outcome in AML-NK cases that were NPM1 mutated and FLT3-ITD nonmutated. Our data confirm that cytoplasmic NPM1 immunoreactivity predicts NPM1 mutations and warrants inclusion in the routine diagnostic and prognostic workup of AML.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.177
Threshold uncertainty score0.543

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Clinical PathologySame topicAcute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchFrench-language works237,207