Photoenolization of 2-(2-Methyl Benzoyl) Benzoic Acid, Methyl Ester: Effect of E Photoenol Lifetime on the Photochemistry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
[reaction: see text] Photolysis of 3 in argon-saturated 2-propanol led to formation of 5 via intermolecular H-atom abstraction followed by lactonization. Irradiation of 4 in 2-propanol gave compounds 6 and 7 that also come from intermolecular H-atom abstraction. In contrast, photolysis of an oxygen-saturated solution of 3 in 2-propanol yields products 8, 9, and 10, which were all formed from intramolecular H-atom abstraction and trapping of the corresponding biradical with oxygen. Laser flash photolysis of 3 in methanol showed formation of biradical 3BR (lambda(max) 330 nm, and tau = 50 ns) via intramolecular H-atom abstraction as the main photoreactivity of 3. Biradical 3BR decayed into photoenols 3Z and 3E (lambda(max) 390 nm, tau = 6.5 micros and tau = 162 micros, respectively). In comparison, laser flash photolysis of 4 yielded photoenols 4Z and 4E (lambda(max) 390 nm, tau = 15 micros and tau = 3.6 ms, respectively). Thus photoenol 3E is unusually short-lived, and therefore it does not undergo the intramolecular lactonization as we have observed for the analogous photoenol 1E. Photoenol 3Z decays back to 3 via an intramolecular 1,5-H shift, whereas photoenol 3E reforms 3 efficiently via the solvent with the aid of the ortho ester group. The intramolecular lactonization of photoenols 1E and 3E must be a slow process, presumably because the photoenols are rigid and the hydroxyl group is inhibited, by intramolecular hydrogen bonding, from acquiring the correct geometry for lactonization. Thus only photoenols that are resistant to reformation of their ketone via the solvent are long-lived enough to undergo lactonization and release the alcohol moiety.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".