The semi‐diurnal tide in Hudson strait as a resonant channel oscillation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Tidal studies have shown that there exists a resonance of the semi‐diurnal tide in the Hudson Bay‐Hudson Strait system. The resonant response is particularly strong within Hudson Strait and Ungava Bay. It is shown here that the semi‐diurnal tide in Hudson Strait has characteristics that are similar to those of a half‐wavelength open channel resonance. A simple analytical model is developed to account for the salient aspects of the semi‐diurnal response in the strait. Non‐dimensional parameters that govern the response are identified and evaluated based on the physical dimensions of the region and results from a numerical tidal model. Taking account of the mechanical impedance presented to the channel by Hudson Bay, the results suggest that a channel mode is resonant near semi‐diurnal periodicities, in general agreement with observations and more complex tidal models of the region. The possibility that Ungava Bay may have a separate quarter‐wavelength resonance driven at the entrance to the continental shelf is also briefly explored.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".