MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085569827 · doi:10.1039/b110399g

H-atom abstraction from thiols by C-centered radicals. A theoretical and experimental study of reaction rates

2002· article· en· W2085569827 on OpenAlexaff
Darren L. Reid, Gennady V. Shustov, David A. Armstrong, Arvi Rauk, Man Nien Schuchmann, Mohammed Shahid Akhlaq, Clemens von Sonntag

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Chemistry Chemical Physics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicFree Radicals and Antioxidants
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryTransition state theoryReaction rate constantRadicalRadiolysisMethanethiolArrhenius equationAb initioPhysical chemistryTransition stateComputational chemistryHydrogen atom abstractionSolvent effectsPhotochemistrySolventOrganic chemistryKineticsActivation energyCatalysisSulfur

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Arrhenius parameters and rates of reaction of three hydroxyradicals, methyl radical, and the hindered primary C-centred radical from t-butyl alcohol with dithiothreitol were measured by pulse radiolysis in water. The bimolecular rate constants were found to be in the order: ˙C(CH3)2OH > ˙CH(CH3)OH > ˙CH2OH > ˙CH3 > ˙CH2C(CH3)2OH. The reaction of three of these, ˙C(CH3)2OH, ˙CH2OH, and ˙CH3, with methanethiol were examined at the ab initio B3LYP/6311+G(d,p) level, coupled with transition state theory, both in the gas phase and in solution. The solvent effects are evaluated by two different continuum models (SCIPCM, CPCM), coupled with a novel approach to the calculation of the solution phase entropy. The reaction is discussed in terms of the charge and spin polarization in the transition state, as determined by AIM analysis, and in terms of orbital interaction theory. Rate constants, calculated by transition state theory are in good agreement with the experimental data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Chemistry Chemical PhysicsSame topicFree Radicals and AntioxidantsFrench-language works237,207