MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085570452 · doi:10.1196/annals.1327.100

Ontogeny of 3β‐Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase and 5α‐Reductase in the Frog Brain

2005· article· en· W2085570452 on OpenAlexaff
Mauro Vallarino, M Mathieu, Jean‐Luc Do‐Régo, Federica Bruzzone, Nicolas Chartrel, Georges Pelletier, Hubert Vaudry

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHormonal Regulation and Hypertension
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiencephalonCerebrumHypothalamusMidbrainOlfactory bulbNeuroactive steroidBiologyNucleusCerebellumEndocrinologyInternal medicinePreoptic areaCentral nervous systemNeuroscienceBiochemistryReceptorMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The distribution of 3beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (3beta-HSD) and 5alpha-reductase (5alpha-R) has been studied in the frog brain during development. Soon after hatching, 3beta-HSD- and 5alpha-R-immunoreactive (ir) cells appeared first in the olfactory bulb and in the rhombencephalon. Subsequently, 3beta-HSD-ir cells were seen in the hypothalamus and cerebellum, whereas 5alpha-R-ir cells were visualized in the pallium, preoptic nucleus, posterocentral nucleus, cerebellum, and pituitary gland. At stages XIII-XVIII, additional 3beta-HSD- and 5alpha-R-ir cells appeared in several regions of the telencephalon, diencephalon, and mesencephalon. At stages XIX-XXI, the number of 5alpha-R-ir cells increased in the preoptic nucleus. These observations indicate that biosynthesis of biologically active steroids occurs in the brain of tadpoles, suggesting that neurosteroids may play a role in brain development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of the New York Academy of SciencesSame topicHormonal Regulation and HypertensionFrench-language works237,207