MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085625264 · doi:10.1139/o03-061

Inactivation and conformational changes of creatine kinase at low concentrations of hexafluoroisopropanol solutions

2003· article· en· W2085625264 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xiaoyun Wang, Fanguo Meng, Hai‐Meng Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Cell Biology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein purification and stability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnzymeCircular dichroismChemistrySubstrate (aquarium)Enzyme assayCreatine kinaseDenaturation (fissile materials)FluorescenceConformational changeProtein secondary structureBiochemistryBiophysicsBiologyNuclear chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using the methods of far-ultraviolet circular dichroism (CD) spectra, fluorescence spectra, and enzyme activity assays, the inactivation and conformational changes of creatine kinase (CK) induced by 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoro-2-propanol (hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP)) of different concentrations were investigated. To avoid the aggregation of CK that occurs with high HFIP, concentrations of 0%-5% HFIP were used in this study. The CD spectra showed that HFIP concentrations above 2.5% strongly induced the formation of secondary structures of CK. No marked conformational changes were observed at low concentrations of HFIP (0%-2.5%). After incubation with 0.2% HFIP for 10 min, CK lost most of its activity. The kinetic theory of the substrate reaction during irreversible inhibition of enzyme activity described previously by Tsou was applied to study the kinetics of CK inactivation during denaturation by HFIP. The inactivation rate constants for the free enzyme and the substrate-enzyme complex were determined by Tsou's method. The results suggested that low concentrations of HFIP had a high potential to induce helices of protein and that the active site of the enzyme was situated in a limited and flexible region of the enzyme molecule that was more susceptible to the denaturant than was the protein as a whole.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.308

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Cell BiologySame topicProtein purification and stabilityFrench-language works237,207