MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085625393 · doi:10.1080/00218460108030723

On Origins of Time-Dependence in Contact Angle Measurements

2001· article· en· W2085625393 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Adhesion · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdsorption, diffusion, and thermodynamic properties of materials
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContact angleInverse gas chromatographyWettingPolymerMaterials scienceSurface energyMethacrylic acidStyreneMethacrylateCopolymerPolarAdsorptionMethyl methacrylatePolymer chemistryChemical engineeringComposite materialOrganic chemistryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Time-dependent variations have been observed in the contact angles of wetting fluids on surfaces of homopolymers poly(styrene) (PS) and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), and copolymers of styrene and 4-vinyl pyridine (P(S-4VP)) and styrene and methacrylic acid (P(S-MAA)). Variations in the case of PS were unimportant, but significant variations occurred with the other polymers, allowing for the definition of both initial and equilibrium contact angle values. The total change in contact angles was strongly dependent on the acid-base contribution to the free energy of adsorption of the wetting fluids on the respective polymer surfaces, as determined from inverse gas chromatography experiments. A tentative correlation also linked the total change in contact angle with the ability of the polymer surfaces to reorganize when in contact with the polar wetting fluids of this study. Careful consideration must be given to the possibility of polymer surface reorganization when selecting fluids for use in the collection of reliable contact angle data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it