MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085660195 · doi:10.1002/adfm.200390001

Solventless Acid‐Free Synthesis of Mesostructured Titania: Nanovessels for Metal Complexes and Metal Nanoclusters

2003· article· en· W2085660195 on OpenAlexaff
Ömer Dag, Ivana Soten, Özgür Çelık, Sebastian Polarz, Neil Coombs, Geoffrey A. Ozin

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Functional Materials · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolyoxometalates: Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNanoclustersMaterials scienceChemical engineeringMetalTitaniumTransmission electron microscopyPulmonary surfactantAmphiphileLyotropicAlkylRaman spectroscopyInorganic chemistryNanotechnologyOrganic chemistryCopolymerLiquid crystalComposite materialChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A new and highly reproducible method to obtain mesostructured titania materials is introduced in this contribution. The mesostructured titania is obtained by employing self‐assembled structures of non‐ionic alkyl‐poly(ethylene oxide) surfactants as templates. The materials are produced without additional solvents such as alcohols, or even water. Only the titanium(IV) ethoxide and the surfactant (C12EO10) are needed. Water, in the form of that attached to the surfactant and from the atmosphere, induces growth of titania nanoclusters in the synthesis sol. It is indicated that these nanoclusters interact with the surfactant EO‐head groups to form a new titanotropic amphiphile. The new amphiphiles self‐assemble into titanium nanocluster–surfactant hybrid lyotropic phases, which are transformed to the final mesostructured materials by further condensation of the titania network. The titania materials can be obtained also with noble‐metal particles immobilized in the mesostructured framework. It is seen that when different metal salts are used as the metal precursors, different interactions with the titania walls are found. The materials are characterized by X‐ray diffraction (XRD), polarization optical microscopy (POM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), UV‐vis spectroscopy, and micro‐Raman analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations58
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Functional MaterialsSame topicPolyoxometalates: Synthesis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207