MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085760196 · doi:10.1210/jc.2011-0465

Giant Cystic Pheochromocytoma Containing High Concentrations of Catecholamines and Metanephrines

2011· article· en· W2085760196 on OpenAlexaff
Alyse S. Goldberg, Stephen E. Pautler, Christopher Harle, Alan Dennis, Irina Rachinsky, Achal Dhir, Shawna Boyle, Vivian C. McAlister, Stan Van Uum

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMetanephrinePheochromocytomaMetanephrinesEpinephrineFentanylBlood pressureAnesthesiaAdrenalectomyEndocrinologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 27-yr-old woman, known with neurofibromatosis type 1 and generalized anxiety disorder, presented with headaches, episodic palpitations, and pallor. Atenolol, started for hypertension by her family doctor, triggered a hypertensive crisis (226/126 mm Hg). Twenty-four-hour urine analysis demonstrated elevated excretion of metanephrine [65.7 (<1.52; upper limit of reference range) μmol/d] and normetanephrine [59.27 (<1.95) μmol/d], and to a lesser extent norepinephrine [2806 (<569) nmol/d] and epinephrine [1222 (<149) nmol/d]. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan showed a large solid and cystic lesion involving the right adrenal gland (Fig. 1A). 131-I methyliodobenzylguanidine scan showed a right adrenal tumor with prominent peripheral uptake and large central defect (Fig. 1B). After medical preparation with 3 wk of phenoxybenzamine (up to 90 mg/d), propranolol, and preoperative saline loading, the patient appeared clinically adequately blocked. However, anesthetic induction (fentanyl, propofol, lidocaine, and rocuronium) caused a hypertensive crisis (280/170 mm Hg) and prevented surgery. Phenoxybenzamine dosage was increased to 60 mg three times a day, and nifedipine SR 30 mg was added. Intravenous phenylephrine (1 mg) did not affect intraarterial blood pressure, indicating adequate α-blockade. The next day, during open adrenalectomy, brittle blood pressure was noted until completion of tumor dissection. A sample of the liquefied tumor center was obtained (Fig. 2). Compared with plasma reference values (1), the cystic fluid contained extremely high concentrations of norepinephrine [65,967 (<3.4) nmol/liter], epinephrine [51,000 (<0.8) nmol/liter], dopamine [791.5 (<0.21) nmol/liter], metanephrine [1,150 (<0.3) nmol/liter], and normetanephrine [2,400 (<0.6) nmol/liter]. Similar findings have previously been reported for catecholamines (2).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.793
Threshold uncertainty score0.350

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & MetabolismSame topicAdrenal and Paraganglionic TumorsFrench-language works237,207