MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085761050 · doi:10.1097/brs.0000000000000386

Presence of Trans-synaptic Neurons Derived From Olfactory Mucosa Transplanted After Spinal Cord Injury

2014· article· en· W2085761050 on OpenAlexaff
Takashi Moriwaki, Koichi Iwatsuki, Noriko Mochizuki‐Oda, Yu‐ichiro Ohnishi, Masahiro Ishihara, Masao Umegaki, Koshi Ninomiya, Toshiki Yoshimine

Bibliographic record

VenueSpine · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNerve injury and regeneration
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOlfactory mucosaMedicineTransplantationSpinal cordSpinal cord injuryBiotinylated dextran aminePathologyAnatomyRespiratory MucosaWheat germ agglutininOlfactory systemAxonRespiratory systemSurgeryImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

STUDY DESIGN: Using biotinylated dextran amine (BDA) and wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) tracers, we measured the effectiveness of olfactory mucosa (OM) transplantation as a scaffold in a rat model of chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). OBJECTIVE: We examined whether OM transplantation for chronic SCI in rats results in reconstruction of neuronal pathways by both regeneration of the remaining axons and supply of OM-derived trans-synaptic neurons. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: OM is one of the ideal scaffolds for axonal regeneration after chronic SCI. METHODS: Rats received a mild contusion at vertebral level T6-T7. Two weeks after SCI, enhanced green fluorescent protein rat-derived OM, respiratory mucosa, and phosphate-buffered saline were transplanted into each group of SCI rats. Ten weeks after SCI, BDA was injected into the right sensorimotor cortex. Eleven weeks after SCI, WGA was injected into the L1-L2 posterior column to label the corticospinal tract retrogradely and trans-synaptically. Twelve weeks after SCI, rats were killed and their spinal cords were divided into cervical (area a), thoracic-injured (area b), and lower thoracic portions (area c). Immunohistochemically, sections of area (b) were evaluated by counting cells positive for enhanced green fluorescent protein, 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, WGA, and BDA (OM and respiratory mucosa groups). Axonal regenerations were estimated by counting WGA- and BDA-positive dots in transverse sections of area (a) and area (c). RESULTS: Compared with respiratory mucosa and phosphate-buffered saline transplantation, OM transplantation increased the number of WGA-positive dots in area (a), and the number of BDA-positive dots in area (c) was more after OM transplantation than after phosphate-buffered saline transplantation. Furthermore, the number of quadruple-positive cells in area (b) was much higher after OM transplantation. CONCLUSION: Our results provide both indirect and direct evidence for the presence of trans-synaptic neurons. OM transplantation in rats with chronic SCI resulted in reconstruction of neural pathways by both providing trans-synaptic neurons and supporting regeneration of remaining axons. The olfactory mucosa is thought to be an efficacious scaffold to produce the relay neuron in chronic spinal cord injury.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpineSame topicNerve injury and regenerationFrench-language works237,207