Framework for potential systems and nonlocal symmetries: Algorithmic approach
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An algorithmic framework is presented to find an extended tree of nonlocally related systems for a given system of differential equations (DEs). Each system in an extended tree is equivalent in the sense that the solution set for any system in a tree can be found from the solution set for any other system in the tree. Useful conservation laws play an essential role in the construction of an extended tree. A useful conservation law yields potential variables and equivalent nonlocally related potential systems and subsystems for any given system. Nonlocal symmetries for a given system of DEs can arise from any system in its extended tree. We construct extended trees for the systems of planar gas dynamics and nonlinear telegraph equations, and in both cases obtain new nonlocal symmetries. More importantly, due to the equivalence of solution sets, any coordinate-independent method of analysis (qualitative, numerical, perturbation, etc.) can be applied to any system within the tree, and may yield simpler computations and/or results that cannot be obtained when the method is directly applied to the given system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it