Serial Histopathology Results of Salvage Cryoablation for Prostate Cancer after Radiation Failure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: There has been a paucity of long-term followup reports of cryoablation for prostate cancer. In particular, little is known regarding the long-term histological results following salvage cryoablation. We report serial biopsy results of up to 43 months on 106 patients who underwent cryoablation after radical radiotherapy failed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 110 cryoablation procedures were done in 106 patients for biopsy proven, clinically localized radiation failure. Postoperatively transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy (usually 4 cores) was done at approximately 3, and/or 6, 12 and 24 months, and thereafter as indicated by prostate specific antigen, which was measured every 6 months. RESULTS: Of 818 biopsy cores a total of 23 (2.8%) from 15 patients (14.2%) were positive. Of the positive cores 73.9% were found within year 1 following cryoablation. Residual viable prostate glands and stroma were found in 42.4% and 27.4% of patients, respectively, at various time points. The frequency of various histological features, the most common being necrosis and fibrosis, was tabulated from the serial biopsy histology reports. CONCLUSIONS: The results of serial biopsies have improved our understanding of the histopathological changes as well as the capabilities and limitations of salvage cryoablation. The biopsy positivity rate is acceptable, although the finding of persistent viable prostatic tissue in a substantial proportion of patients implies that vigilant long-term followup is mandatory.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".