MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

X-ray spectrum variations in the south-west Cygnus Loop

2004· article· en· W2085828435 on OpenAlexaff
D. A. Leahy

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsROSATSupernovaAcisSpectral lineSupernova remnantSpectral resolutionAstronomyGalaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Cygnus Loop is one of the nearest supernova remnants (440 pc), allowing studies of spatial variations to be carried out at high physical resolution compared with other supernova remnants. Chandra Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer (ACIS) observations were obtained covering the bright V-shaped region on the south-west limb. This region has strong 0.2–2 keV spectral variations seen with the ROSAT Position Sensitive Proportional Counter. The nature of the spectral variations is analysed using the ACIS observations. It is found that temperature, abundance variations and column density variations all have a significant contribution to the observed spectral variations. Fits with C, N, O (O group) elements and Ne, Na, Mg, Al, Si, S, Ar (Ne group) elements varied together are better than fits with just O and Ne varied. Large spatial variations in abundances are seen, yet the Ne group to O group ratio and the Fe group (Ca, Fe, Ni) to O group ratio are nearly constant for all of the spectra. The most natural explanation is that the elements in the region are due to supernova explosion of a star of ∼18 M⊙ which predated the Cygnus Loop explosion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietySame topicAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207