Serotonin-System Polymorphisms (5-HTTLPR and -1438G/A) and Responses of Patients With Bulimic Syndromes to Multimodal Treatments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We tested the hypothesis that individuals carrying low-function alleles of the serotonin transporter (5-HTTLPR) and 5-HT(2A) receptor gene (-1438G/A) promoter polymorphisms would show relatively poor treatment responses on indices of bulimic and concurrent symptoms. METHOD: Participants included 111 women with bulimia-spectrum eating disorders (DSM-IV-TR criteria), 98 of whom were followed through 4- to 8-month spans of specialized multimodal treatment to enable examination of relationships between genotypes and prospective changes in eating and general psychiatric symptoms. Given a hierarchically structured dataset and a desire to control for effects of variations in adjunctive pharmacotherapy, individual therapy, group therapy, or day treatment, we used multilevel modeling techniques. The study was conducted between October 2001 and May 2007. RESULTS: After effects of treatments were removed, 5-HTTLPR low-function allele carriers showed smaller treatment reductions in binge eating (p < .01) and in anxiety and depression (p < .05), whereas low-function -1438G/A G carriers showed smaller reductions in binge eating (p < .01) and impulsivity (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: This study documents an expected association between poorer bulimia-treatment response and low-function alleles of 5-HTTLPR and -1438G/A--and suggests that such effects cannot be attributed to mediating influences of medication or psychotherapy responsiveness alone. A better understanding of hereditary, serotonin-mediated factors affecting bulimic individuals' progress during therapy may facilitate the development of more effective treatments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".