MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

HABITAT USE BY BLACK RAT SNAKES (<i>ELAPHE OBSOLETA OBSOLETA</i>) IN FRAGMENTED FORESTS

2001· article· en· W2085945756 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEcology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEcologyHabitatBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Declining nest success of forest birds in fragmented habitat has been attributed to increased nest predation. Better understanding of this problem and potential solutions to it require information on why nest predators are attracted to habitat edges. Toward this end we investigated habitat use by black rat snakes (Elaphe obsoleta obsoleta), an important avian-nest predator in eastern deciduous forests. We radio-tracked 52 black rat snakes for periods of 3–41 mo from 1996 to 1999. All black rat snakes exhibited a strong preference for edge habitats. Consistent with edges being used because they facilitate thermoregulation, gravid females associated more strongly with edges than did males and nongravid females, and sites used by snakes when shedding were significantly associated with habitat edges. Gravid females lost an average of >20% of their body mass, while nongravid females and males did not lose mass, suggesting that edges were not used because they offered high success in foraging. Similarly, an increase in use of edge habitat through the season by all rat snakes was inconsistent with the snakes being attracted principally to hunt: avian prey would have been more abundant in spring when birds were breeding, and the density of small mammals in edges did not vary seasonally. Also, snakes moved longer distances and were found traveling more often when located in forests. Because our results collectively are most consistent with the hypothesis that rat snakes use edges for thermoregulatory reasons, the negative impact of the snakes on nesting birds may be coincidental; the snakes primarily use edges for reasons other than foraging but opportunistically exploit prey they encounter there. Rat snakes appeared to respond to the edge structure rather than to how the edge was created (natural vs. artificial). Thus, fragmentation of forests by humans has created habitat structurally similar to that preferred by rat snakes in their natural habitat, thereby inadvertently increasing contact between the snakes and nesting birds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.100
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it