MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085960345 · doi:10.1177/0885066602017004003

Review of a Large Clinical Series: Outcome of Pediatric Status Epilepticus Admitted to Intensive Care

2002· review· en· W2085960345 on OpenAlexaffabout
Simon Parsons, Katarina Tomas, Peter N. Cox

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Intensive Care Medicine · 2002
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEtiologyStatus epilepticusPediatricsIntensive care unitPediatric intensive care unitPsychological interventionRetrospective cohort studyIntensive care medicineEpilepsyEmergency medicineSurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors determine the relationship between seizure duration, etiology, and outcome in a modern intensive care setting and assess the usefulness of computed tomography (CT) and the empiric use of antimicrobial therapy. The design was a retrospective chart review. The setting was a tertiary pediatric critical care unit. Patients included 161 consecutive admissions to the critical care unit at the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, with status epilepticus over a 3-year period. There were no interventions. The overall mortality was 5.6%. A further 11% experienced an adverse neurological outcome as determined on hospital discharge. Mean seizure duration was 1.5 ± 2.8 hours in those children with a normal outcome, 1.7 ± 1.2 hours in those survivors with an abnormal neurological outcome ( P > 0.05), and 6.8 ± 12 hours in those who died ( P < 0.05). The CT scan was abnormal in 41% of cases. New findings that directly affected immediate management decisions were found in 20% of CT scans. Both the duration and etiology of status epilepticus affect the outcome. CT scanning should be done without delay, once the patient is stable. Antiviral therapy should be started empirically now that encephalitis is far more common than bacterial meningitis in this group of patients. Studies are lacking that compare the efficacy of drugs available to treat status epilepticus. These studies need to be done, as the findings could affect the duration of status.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.090
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.383
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.090
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0120.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.131
GPT teacher head0.479
Teacher spread0.349 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Intensive Care MedicineSame topicEpilepsy research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207